Legal Opinion

People v. Reichenbach

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 11, 1997No. Docket 192978PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The prosecution appeals by leave granted an opinion and order of the Kalamazoo Circuit Court affirming an earlier decision of the 8th District Court that held that defendant’s 1989 plea of guilty to operating a motor vehicle while having an unlawful blood alcohol level (ubal), MCL 257.625; MSA 9.2325, had not met the requirements of MCR 6.201(E)(2), now MCR 6.610(E)(2) 1 , and, therefore, could not be used as a basis for defendant’s present charge of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor and/or ubal, third offense (oun/UBAL-3rd), MCL 257.625; MSA 9.2325. 2…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Genesee Prosecutor v. Genesee Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. TempletonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. TempletonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. ReichenbachMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. AsquiniMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. People v. ReichenbachMichigan Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API