Legal Opinion

Chermak v. Chermak

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1949No. 28,525PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStarr, J.

This action is an equitable one seeking, by direct attack, to set aside and vacate for fraud, a decree of the Porter Circuit Court, wherein the appellee obtained a divorce from the appellant.

The trial court sustained appellee’s demurrer to appellant’s amended complaint for insufficient facts; that ruling alone is assigned as error.

The substantial allegations of the amended complaint are as follows: That appellee had a husband living at the time of her marriage to appellant; that appellee knew she was not divorced from her husband at the time she married appellant, and when she brought her…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Laun v. KippWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Bolden v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Publicker v. ShallcrossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  5. Walker v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. In Re Paternity of TompkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Magnuson v. BlickenstaffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Matter of Paternity of RCIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. DuShane v. DuShaneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API