Legal Opinion

Magnuson v. Blickenstaff

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1987No. 79A02-8603-CV-99PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUCHANAN, Judge.

CASE SUMMARY

Appellant-plaintiff John H. Magnuson (Magnuson) appeals the granting of a motion to dismiss his complaint to set aside a default judgment, filed by Kenneth L. Blickenstaff d/b/a Blickenstaff Rural Realty (Blickenstaff), claiming fraud was perpetrated on the trial court.

We affirm.

FACTS

On July 12, 1982, Blickenstaff brought an action against Magnuson and his wife *816seeking recovery of a commission allegedly owed him by the Magnusons pursuant to a real estate listing agreement. Magnuson and his wife failed to appear at the hear-img, and Blickenstaff obtained a default…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Martha Ann Brundage Rozier v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. Michael R. Wood, Individually and Dba National Photo Services v. Willard W. McEwen Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Edward Serzysko v. The Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  5. DeClaire v. YohananSupreme Court of Florida · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Paternity of TompkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Weinreb v. TR DEVELOPERS, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Matter of Paternity of RCIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Mickle v. KirkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. G.M. v. A.C.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API