Legal Opinion

Warda v. Schmidt

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 26, 1956No. Civ. 16895PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff on a book account.

Plaintiff is a plastering contractor. Defendant is a builder. During the years 1946-1949 defendant opened in the City of Millbrae a subdivision known as Meadow Glen. In 1946 defendant built 48 houses. Plaintiff did the outside plastering work on these houses under an oral contract. He was paid $500 per house. In 1947 defendant commenced building a group of 171 houses. He furnished to plaintiff a master tract plan to enable plaintiff to bid on the plastering work for the 171 houses. The master plan indicated that the 171 houses…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Parker v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Mercantile Trust Co. of S.F. v. DoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  3. Lee v. DeForestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Tillson v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Egan v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tsemetzin v. Coast Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. H. Russell Taylor's Fire Prevention Service, Inc. v. Coca Cola Bottling Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,031 in Re Roberts Farms Incorporated, Debtor. Roberts Farms Incorporated v. Glenn Bultman John KellyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Filmservice Laboratories, Inc. v. Harvey Bernhard Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Leighton v. ForsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API