Legal Opinion

Washa v. Oregon Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 17, 1999No. 94C-10004, CA A93626 (Control); 94C-10005, CA A93627PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*210HASELTON, J.

Defendant, Oregon Department of Corrections (DOC), appeals from a judgment for damages resulting from violent crimes that a parolee committed while under DOC’s supervision. We agree with defendant that it had not “taken charge” of the parolee within the meaning of section 319 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965). However, we also conclude that the harm plaintiffs suffered was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of defendant’s inadequate supervision of the parolee, and that, in the circumstances presented here, the parolee’s actions were not the sort of supervening criminal…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Fox v. CustisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  3. Taggart v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Sterling v. BloomIdaho Supreme Court · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McPherson v. State Ex Rel. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. Brown v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Knepper v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Miller Ex Rel. Miller v. Tabor West Investment Co., LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. McAlpine v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API