City of Bos. Delegation v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
III
We review the Commission's grant of a Section 7 certificate "under the familiar arbitrary and capricious standard," bearing in mind that "the grant or denial of" such a certificate "is a matter peculiarly within the discretion of the Commission." Minisink , 762 F.3d at 105-06 (brackets and citation omitted). Applying that standard, we sustain the Commission's order against the challenges brought jointly by the Town, Riverkeeper, and the coalition.
A
In the first set of arguments raised by petitioners, they contend that the Commission failed to comply with NEPA in approving the AIM Project.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Coalition on Sensible Transportation, Inc. v. Elizabeth DoleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Nevada v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Delaware Riverkeeper Network v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Sierra Club v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Krukas v. AARP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Environmental Health Trust v. FCCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
- Food & Water Watch v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- Alabama Municipal Distributors Group v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024
- Delaware Riverkeeper Network v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.