Legal Opinion
Rosso v. Freeman
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 19, 1929No. Nos. 2957-2960, 2974PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
The above-entitled actions were brought in the state court to recover for personal injuries, alleged to have been sustained as the result of a collision in Massachusetts between a bus of the Hartford & Springfield Street Railway Company and another automobile. The actions have been duly removed to this court and are now presented on defendant’s answers in abatement, filed in the state court. The same question is raised in each of the above cases, and the several pleas may conveniently be disposed of in one opinion.
The defendant seeks to have the writs abated on two…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Barton v. BarbourSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Davis v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Porter v. SabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- McNulta v. LochridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ziegler v. PitneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Canney v. City of ChelseaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
- Mitchell Woodbury Corp. v. Albert Pick Barth Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930
- Riley v. Decoulos (In Re American Bridge Products, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Mitchell Woodbury Corp. v. Albert Pick-Barth Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1929