Legal Opinion
Mitchell Woodbury Corp. v. Albert Pick Barth Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 5, 1930No. 2445PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILSON, Circuit Judge.
An action to recover threefold damages under section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 USCA § 15). The plaintiff is a Massachusetts corporation, dealing in china, glassware, kitchen utensils, and equipment. The defendant, Albert Pick Barth Co., Inc., is a Maryland corporation and the other two defendants are residents of Massachusetts. Federal jurisdiction is based on section 4 of the U. S. C. title 15 (15 USCA § 4).
The ease is before this court on alleged error in the ruling of the court below in sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff’s declaration. Upon the issue thus raised…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Glenn Coal Co. v. Dickinson Fuel Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Albert Pick-Barth Co. v. Mitchell Woodbury Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1932
- C. Albert Sauter Co., Inc. v. Richard S. Sauter Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- United States v. Association of American RailroadsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
- Atlantic Heel Co., Inc. v. Allied Heel Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1960
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.