Legal Opinion

People v. Stewart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 5, 2009PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from an order of the Erie County Court (Michael E Pietruszka, J.), entered September 4, 2008. The order determined that defendant is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that he is a level two risk under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.), defendant contends that County Court erred in refusing to deduct 10 points assessed by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders for forcible compulsion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. HamelinckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. People v. LaRockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. People v. MothersellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. People v. FeeneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. People v. RichardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. WILSON, CHARLES R., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API