Legal Opinion
People v. Hamelinck
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 10, 2005PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order of the Wayne County Court (Dennis M. Kehoe, J.), dated September 8, 2004. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order designating him a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). Following a hearing, County Court adopted the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders in classifying…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. GuamanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. AhlersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. TuckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. MarksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. GuzmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. VacantiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. PerrahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. EnsellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.