Legal Opinion
Massachusetts Highway Department v. Perini Corp.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 26, 2005PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.
An arbitration panel, commissioned to resolve certain disagreements between the public agencies overseeing the Central Artery/Tunnel Project (Massachusetts Highway Department and the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, collectively, the project) and one of its general contractors, determined that it had the authority to hear the contractor’s claim to additional compensation for unexpected construction problems. The project disagreed and sought relief, including a stay of the arbitration proceedings in the Superior Court. That relief was denied and the complaints were dismissed. On appeal, the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Green Tree Financial Corp. v. BazzleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Superadio Ltd. Partnership v. Winstar Radio Productions, LLCMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Walker v. CollyerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
- Joulé, Inc. v. SimmonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- Kingstown Corp. v. Black Cat Cranberry Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Merrimack College v. KPMG LLPMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.