Legal Opinion
Matter of Anderson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 26, 1984No. 83-514PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
By order of May 20, 1983, we temporarily suspended respondent from the practice of law. We did so upon receipt of a certified copy of a judgment and probation order filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia which indicated that respondent pleaded guilty to three counts of false pretenses. D.C.Code § 22-1301 (1981).
We are now in receipt of the Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility that respondent be disbarred from the practice of law. The Board found that respondent’s offenses in volved moral turpitude, requiring disbarment under…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of ColsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Matter of KerrDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Matter of WillcherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re McBrideDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re FrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- Matter of BondDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re UntalanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In re McBrideDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.