Legal Opinion

In re McBride

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 18, 1990No. 88-1563PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We are called upon to consider a Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility that respondent be disbarred from the practice of law. The Board found that respondent was convicted in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia of one count of aiding and abetting a client to commit passport fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(4) (1988). The Board also concluded that this offense involves moral turpitude, thus requiring disbarment pursuant to D.C.Code § ll-2503(a) (1989).

We accept the Board’s findings of fact as supported by substantial evidence,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. PeoniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  4. United States v. Bobby StatenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Anthony ProvenzanoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re SimsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. MATTER OF McBRIDEDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. In Re SimsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API