Legal Opinion

Whitman v. Hanson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1944No. Files Nos. 8612-8619PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, J.

In this action, the plaintiff seeks to set aside the conveyance of certain real property made by him to the defendant, J. F. Hanson. Plaintiff’s action is predicated upon the claim that the conveyances were made in payment of certain alleged attorney fees which the defendant, Hans Hanson, claimed were owing to him by the plaintiff, and that such attorney fees were unfair and unconscionable. The trial court refused to set aside the conveyances and the plaintiff has appealed.

The following facts are without dispute in the record: The plaintiff, Charles J. Whitman, is the son of Joseph H.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ofstad v. BeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Whitman v. WhitmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Durr v. HardestySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Aimonetto v. Rapid Gas, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Oskey Brothers Petroleum Corporation v. GorderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Durr v. HardestySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API