Legal Opinion

Gunnell v. Dalkon Shield Trust (In re A.H. Robins Co.)

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided August 16, 1994No. 84-01307-RPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

MERHIGE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on motion by Daikon Shield Claimants Trust (“Trust”) Claimant Anthony Gunnell, DS-221545, to increase the limit on his potential award under alternative dispute resolution (ADR). When Gunnell elected to resolve his claim through ADR, the limit on awards was $10,-000. Thereafter the Trust raised the limit to $20,000. Claimant, by counsel, asks the Court to allow the ADR referee to use the new $20,000 limit in considering his claim. For reasons given below, the Court denies the motion.

On April 1,1992, the Trust established the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Menard-Sanford v. A.H. Robins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. In Re AH Robins Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
  3. In re A.H. Robins Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bledsoe v. Dalkon Shield Trust (In re A.H. Robins Co.)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
  2. Galarneau v. Dalkon Shield Trust (In re A. H. Robins Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
  3. Kidd v. Dalkon Shield Trust (In re A.H. Robins Co.)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
  4. Dalkon Shield Trust v. Fleming (In re A.H. Robins Co.)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
  5. Reichel v. Dalkon Shield Trust (In re A.H. Robins Co.)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API