Legal Opinion

Reichel v. Dalkon Shield Trust (In re A.H. Robins Co.)

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided December 2, 1994No. 85-01307-RPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

MERHIGE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Movants’ motion to interpret, in part, the Sixth Amended and Restated Plan of Reorganization of the A.H. Robins Company (“Plan”) and the related documents under which the Robins Bankruptcy is being managed. The Movants have requested that the Court interpret these instruments in the following manner:(1) Claims Resolution Facility (“CRF”) § G.2 governs the Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”) process and requires the Trust to presume that the injuries listed in CRF Exhibit A are caused by the Daikon Shield;(2) First…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Menard-Sanford v. A.H. Robins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. In Re AH Robins Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
  3. In Re A.H. Robins Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  4. Besag v. Dalkon Shield Trust (In re A.H. Robins Co.)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
  5. In re A.H. Robins Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Galarneau v. Dalkon Shield Trust (In re A. H. Robins Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
  2. Dalkon Shield Trust v. Fleming (In re A.H. Robins Co.)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
  3. King v. Dalkon Shield Trust (In re A.H. Robins Co.)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API