Legal Opinion

Salisbury v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1933No. Docket No. 82, Calendar No. 37,269PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Varying phases of this litigation appear in Miller v. City of Detroit, 244 Mich. 38; Miller v. City of Detroit, 250 Mich. 633; Blanchard v. City of Detroit, 253 Mich. 491; and Salisbury v. City of Detroit, 258 Mich. 235. In the decision last above noted we affirmed the order of the circuit judge transferring the suit from the equity to the law side of the court. A so-called amended declaration was filed, which recited that plaintiffs adopted their former' bill of complaint as their declaration with one additional paragraph by way of amendment, which recited:

“The several plaintiffs paid to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. State v. New Haven & Northampton Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1877
  3. Miller v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Blanchard v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Salisbury v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Toan v. McGinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Powers v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Dahlstrom v. City of WhitehallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. v. Jocelyn BensonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API