Moseley v. South Carolina Highway Department
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Oxner, Justice.
The question presented may be briefly stated as follows: Is the State Highway Department exempt from liability for compensation where in the course of constructing or improv ing a state highway within a municipality, it takes private property for public use? The Court below held that it was not exempt. On this appeal, the Department contends that the sole liability for damages sustained by the landowner rests under the statute upon the municipality.
Plaintiff, the owner of a lot of land in the town of McBee, upon which a hotel is located, brought this action against the State…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chick Springs Water Co. v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Milhous v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- Taylor v. Richmond CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
3Cited by4 opinions
- McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- McCall ex rel. Andrews v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Willimon v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
- Robinson v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962