Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Planning Board

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 17, 1976PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We need not consider the board’s contention that the plan submitted by the plaintiff for an endorsement that approval under the Subdivision Control Law was not required in fact showed a “subdivision” within the meaning of G. L. c. 41, § 81L (as amended through St. 1965, c. 61), as the board’s failure to act upon it within fourteen days after its submission entitled the plaintiff to such an endorsement (G. L. c. 41, § 81P [as appearing in St. 1963, c. 363, § 1]; Devine v. Town Clerk of Plymouth, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 747, 748 [1975]), and the board’s determination thereafter that the plan did…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pieper v. PLANNING BOARD OF SOUTHBOROUGH.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  2. Cassani v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973
  3. Peabody Construction Co. v. First Federal Parking Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  4. Hazard v. KeefeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  5. Devine v. Town ClerkMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Frank D. Wayne Associates, Inc. v. LussierMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  2. Lynch v. Town of GrotonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API