Legal Opinion

Hazard v. Keefe

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 13, 1975PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1. There is no occasion for us to consider the propriety of the interlocutory decree overruling the defendants’ demurrer to this bill in equity for specific performance of their contract to sell their premises to the plaintiff, as the demurrer was addressed solely to matters of pleading and the decree overruling it, from which no appeal was taken, is not shown to have erroneously affected the final decree subsequently entered. See G. L. c. 214, § 27 (as then in effect); Burwen v. Burwen, 2 Mass. App. Ct. 29, 31 (1974). 2. The defendants’ appeals from the interlocutory decree confirming the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kagan v. LevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  2. O'BRIEN v. DwightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Moskow v. BurkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  4. Siegel v. KnottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Porter v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lynch v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
  2. ChiCorp Financial Services, Inc. v. University of MassachusettsMassachusetts Superior Court · 1994
  3. Whitney v. JohnsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API