Legal Opinion

Nomeland v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 20, 1991No. 88-01084; CA A63771PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that reversed the referee and allowed employer to offset claimant’s preexisting hearing loss in determining his scheduled permanent disability.

Claimant suffered a compensable hearing loss while working for employer. The parties have stipulated that claimant also had a significant hearing loss before his employment, as established by an audiogram. The only question on review is how to treat claimant’s documented, preemployment hearing loss in calculating the extent of his disability. The Board held that claimant was entitled…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Barrett v. D & H DRYWALLOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Barrett v. D & H DrywallOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. American Building Maintenance v. McLeesOregon Supreme Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Papen v. Willamina Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Foster Wheeler Corp. v. MarbleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. James River Corp. v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. McDermott v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API