Legal Opinion
Iannopollo v. Barnhart
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided August 4, 2003No. 6:02-cv-06245PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This is an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) that Anthony J. Iannopollo (“plaintiff’) is not disabled under the Social Security Act, and therefore, is not entitled to Social Security disability insurance (“SSDI”) benefits. Both plaintiff and the Commissioner have moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c). As discussed below, the Court finds that the Commissioner’s decision was based on legal error and,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Ronald E. Veino, Sr. v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Goldthrite v. AstrueDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2008
- Huhta v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2004
- Orr v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- Street v. BarnhartDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2004
- Chaney v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.