Legal Opinion

Schick v. Steiger

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 23, 1984No. Civ. 83-0474PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RALPH M. FREEMAN, Senior District Judge.

This motion for summary judgment, brought by the defendant, raises an important issue in the area of securities regulation. The question is whether a person who gives misleading information to investors may assert the defense of in pari delicto in an action for fraud brought by the investors because the investors believed they were receiving material nonpublic information and traded upon such information without disclosure.

The facts, as adduced from the pleadings, need be stated only generally for purposes of this motion. Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Dirks v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Platsis v. EF Hutton & Co. Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1986
  2. Doe v. PetersonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
  3. Wise v. Kidder Peabody & Co., Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API