Legal Opinion

Higginbotham v. Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 1, 1993No. 92-148Published

1Opinion of the Court

849 S.W.2d 464 (1993)

312 Ark. 199

Scott HIGGINBOTHAM, Appellant,

v.

ARKANSAS BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD, A Mutual Insurance Company, Appellee.

No. 92-148.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

March 1, 1993.

Donald J. Adams, Harrison, for appellant.

George R. Rhoads, Rogers, for appellee.

HAYS, Justice.

This dispute between insured and insurer over proceeds arising from personal injuries to the insured is certified to us by the Court of Appeals as containing both an issue of significant public interest and a legal principle of major importance. Our jurisdiction attaches under Rule 29.4(b) of the Rules of the…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Garrity v. Rural Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Rimes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Culver v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  4. Powell v. Blue Cross and Blue ShieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Lyon v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API