Legal Opinion
United States v. Martha Marie Manion, AKA Mary Peters
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 14, 2003No. 01-50562PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Martha Manion was convicted of mail and wire fraud for knowing participation in a fraudulent telemarketing scheme. She claims she was improperly convicted because the government was required to show that she devised the fraudulent scheme, or the court was required to instruct the jury on co-schemer or aiding and abetting liability. We conclude the jury was properly instructed on the standard for liability under the mail and wire fraud statutes, and that there was sufficient evidence to convict Manion for her own fraudulent acts as a knowing participant in the scheme. Since we also…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Hilda Escobar De BrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. David Phillip Munoz Bennie E. McGregor Donald L. ThomsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Terrill DixonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Juan Carlos Bautista-Avila, United States of America v. Gabriel Figueroa-Levya, United States of America v. Jorge Armenta-EstradaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Robert L. Beecroft, Arthur T. Harrison, James F. Hennig, and Delbert L. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. John Anthony WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. HoldenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. CrandallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- People v. RosadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- United States v. Jack HoldenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.