Legal Opinion

United States v. John Anthony Williams

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 21, 2006No. 05-30071PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRABER, Circuit Judge.

Defendant John Anthony Williams appeals his conviction and sentence for mail and wire fraud and money laundering. His main argument is that the government improperly charged him under an “intangible rights” theory of mail and wire fraud, because that theory does not apply to private individuals, and that the absence of a special verdict makes it impossible to determine whether the jury found “direct” fraud or “intangible rights” fraud. Since Congress passed 18 U.S.C. § 1346, we have not addressed directly whether the “intangible rights” theory applies to private-sector…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. United States v. Thi Marilyn DangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. SorichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Kincaid-ChaunceyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. InzunzaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. MilovanovicCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API