Legal Opinion

Patrick Farms, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 1936No. Civ. 10191PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Petitioner seeks a writ of mandate to compel the respondent court to issue a commission for the taking of the deposition of a witness in the city of Chicago.

A motion for the issuance of said commission was made by petitioner in the respondent court in an action for an accounting in which petitioner was the plaintiff. The defendant in that action had filed his answer denying certain material allegations of the complaint. It was also alleged in said answer that the parties had theretofore had an accounting regarding the matters mentioned in the complaint and that defendant had paid to plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. S.F. Gas & Elec. Co. v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Bar Assn. of San Diego v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. Levin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hays v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. McClatchy Newspapers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Hauk v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Verdier v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Ahern v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API