Legal Opinion
United States v. Staggs
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 7, 1989No. Nos. 88-1275, 88-1469, 88-1471 and 88-1473PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Appellants were convicted by a jury on a variety of federal drug and drug-related charges arising out of an alleged operation to produce amphetamine, a schedule II controlled substance. See 21 C.F.R. § 1308.12(d) (1987). Specifically, appellants Donald Eugene Staggs (Staggs), Charles David “Rusty” Teafatiller (Teafa-tiller), Peggy Savage Teafatiller, and Frank E. Gabriel (Gabriel), were each convicted of conspiring to manufacture, possess with intent to distribute, and distribute amphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1).1 Teafatiller and Staggs also…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando EstevezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- United States v. John W. Bolton, A/K/A GinoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Soto-BeniquezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- United States v. PaulinoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Kenneth Eugene HaddockCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. David MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.