Legal Opinion

Ortynski v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1943No. Docket No. 47, Calendar No. 42,407PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It was not error to submit the question of contributory negligence to the jury. In the Rosencranz Case, 244 Mich. 137, relied upon by Mr. Justice WIEST as controlling, the accident occurred in the daytime when plaintiff drove onto the fourth track of a four-track railroad right of way, having crossed three of the tracks. He made an observation before entering upon the first track, but did not maintain any proper care and caution thereafter. Although his vision was obstructed by cars standing on the third track, he made no further observation in either direction before driving onto the fourth…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rosencranz v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Jones v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Gaffka v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Rogers v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Fisher v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cabana v. City of HartMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Stuive v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Wiles v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. AckersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
  5. Attwood Brass Works v. Aero-Motive Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API