Legal Opinion

Cherry Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 5, 1945No. 45885PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDEN, Judge.

The plaintiff in 1936 made an application to The First National Bank of Florence, Florence, Alabama, for a loan of $110,000, to be evidenced by a note secured by certain collateral, with the understanding that the bank would request the Reconstruction Finance Corporation to agree to purchase a participation in the note. As a result of the negotiations, as set forth at length in the special findings of fact, the plaintiff executed a note for $110,000, with interest at 5 percent per annum and mortgaged certain securities therefor. The bank made the loan secured by the mortgage and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. JG Menihan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. John Morrell & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939
  4. Crane v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. National Cored Forgings Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  2. Abbott v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  3. Erie Basin Metal Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  4. Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Foster Wheeler Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1947
  5. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Foust Distilling Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API