Legal Opinion

Marziale v. Spanish Fork City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 2017No. Case No. 20160696PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice Himonas, opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 This appeal requires us to decide whether a credit card error that caused Carole and James Marziale's complaint against Spanish Fork City (the City) to be rejected means that their complaint and the attached undertaking were not timely filed. We affirm the court of appeals and hold that the payment error did not affect the timeliness of the Marziales' filing.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 The Marziales submitted a complaint against the City alleging that Ms. Marziale was injured from a fall at the City's sports complex on July 11, 2011. The Marziales first…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Nelson v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Hansen v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Utah Department of Transportation v. CarlsonUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Colosimo v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coburn v. Whitaker ConstructionUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Zemlicka v. West Jordan CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API