Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Coe v. Harrison

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 22, 1927No. 4 Div. 353PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

This proceeding brings into question the right of appellee to hold the office, of councilman - of the city of Dothan. Appellee was eligible to the office when elected, but since his induction into office he has failed to pay the poll tax due from him to the state, and so, confessedly, at the time of the institution of this proceeding, was not a qualified elector.

The result depends upon the proper interpretation of section 1761 of the Code, reading as follows:

“1761 (1069) Mayor and Council; Qualifications; Eligibility of. — Every mayor, councilman and officer elected by the whole electorate of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. State ex rel. EnslenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. Finklea v. FarishSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Draper v. State ex rel. PatilloSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Olson v. LangerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Dorf v. SkolnikCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. State Ex Rel. Smith v. BohannanArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State Ex Rel. McIntyre v. McEachernSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. State Ex Rel. Moore v. BlakeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API