Legal Opinion
Danbury & Bethel Fur Co. v. American Hatters & Furriers Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 7, 1931No. 93-95PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
These three suits for infringement of patents Nos. 1,507,891 and 1,507,892, granted to Parks, were tried together, and will be considered in one opinion.
The patent No. 1,507,891 is for a composition of matter employed in carrying on the process patent No. 1,507,892. The latter is the process and product patent. Both were granted on September 9,1924, on applications filed June 30; 1923. They propose the conjoint use as a carrot of an oxidizing agent, as hydrogen peroxide, and a caustie alkali, as sodium hydroxide. Carroting is an art used in the manufacture of felt hats.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- United States v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Remington Rand Business Service, Inc. v. Acme Card System Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- In Re ThuauCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
- United States v. Elmer C. OberhellmannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. Triangle Mechanical Laboratories, Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1935
- S. H. Kress & Company v. Elie P. Aghnides and Chase Brass & Copper Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.