Legal Opinion

California Notion & Toy Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 28, 1922No. Civ. No. 4313PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.

This matter comes to us upon a writ of review. It is contended by petitioner that an award of the Industrial Accident Commission, allowing compensation to E'dward G. Fennig for a period from September 24, 1921, to February 28, 1922, the date of the award, is unwarranted and should be annulled. The commission found that since the injury the applicant has been suffering from a diseased condition of the blood vessels and any disability existing after the date of the award is due to said diseased condition and not to said injury.

Edward G. Fennig, at the time of the accident involved here, was a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. G. L. Eastman Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Puckhaber v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Brooker v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Casualty Co. of America v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Musselman v. Central Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  2. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Allied Compensation Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Armstrong Tire & Rubber Co. v. KubliCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1981
  5. National Automobile & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API