Legal Opinion

People v. Waterloo Stock Car Corp.

New York County Courts

Decided March 21, 1977PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrederick D. Dugan, J.

This appeal comprehends the constitutionality of section 23-1 of the Waterloo Village Code and certain procedures before the Waterloo Village Court upon the return of appearance tickets issued after the filing of six informations alleging its violation by respondents.

A so-called "anti-noise” ordinance, section 23-1 of the Code of the Village of Waterloo, a violation, was adopted in 1915 and reads as follows: "No person shall hereafter make or contribute to or aid or assist in making any loud, unusual, annoying or frightful noises in any part of said village.”

In August, 1976, a racetrack in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. ByronNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. People v. RubenfeldNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. De Sena v. GuldeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  4. Johnson v. BoldmanNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  5. People v. Dominick, New York County Courts1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. WestNew Paltz Justice Court · 2004
  2. People v. VancolJustice Court of Village of Westbury · 1995
  3. People v. WestNew Paltz Justice Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API