Legal Opinion

Gamble v. Liquor Control Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1949No. Calendar No. 44,285PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

Plaintiffs, three of whom are attendants and members of the Union Church in the village of Greenbush, filed their petition in this, Court for a writ of mandamus to compel the defendant liquor control commission to revoke a class “C” license issued to Morton Dermer and Harry Dermer for the sale of liquor for consumption on the premises at the G-reenbush Inn, for the reason that the inn is located, as plaintiffs allege, within 500 feet of the Union Church “by the regularly traveled thoroughfare.” On entry of an order to show cause defendants filed their answer and return which “admit the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. People v. SchafranMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. George v. TravisMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Hanold v. Common Council of StambaughMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. People v. SchneiderMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Alphonse Lewis, Jr. v. City of Grand RapidsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
  2. Kassab v. AchoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Elliott v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Lewis v. City of Grand Rapids, MichiganDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1963
  5. Tabaczka v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API