Hanold v. Common Council of Stambaugh
Michigan Supreme Court
Certiorari to Iron; Flannigan, J. Mandamus by William F. Hanold to compel the common council of the village of Stambaugh to revoke a liquor license and grant relator’s application to sell liquor at retail. An order denying the writ is reviewed by relator on writ of certiorari.
1Opinion of the CourtBird, C. J.
The relator, William F. Hanold, applied to the circuit court for the county of Iron for a writ of mandamus to compel the common council of the village of Stambaugh to grant his application for a liquor license. The circuit judge denied his application, and relator has removed the proceeding to this court for review.
The village of Stambaugh is entitled under the law (Act No. 291, Pub. Acts 1909) to a maximum of nine saloons. Previous to May 16th, the council had granted nine applications for licenses, including one to respondent Stivonski. Stivonski failed to file his approved bond with the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Robison v. MinerMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Amperse v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by8 opinions
- Scott v. Arcada Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Rohde v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Gamble v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Elliott v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Price v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.