In re: A.R.C., K.M.W., C.W.S.W.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
INMAN, Judge.
*603 Respondent-Mother ("Mother") appeals from orders terminating her parental rights with respect to each of her four children, A.R.C. ("Amy"), K.M.W. ("Kim"), C.W.S.W. ("Connor"), and A.S.W. ("Amber," collectively "the children"), 1 arguing that she was denied effective assistance of counsel because her trial counsel failed to advocate for her in the termination hearing. After careful review of the record and applicable law, we remand for the trial court to determine whether Mother is entitled to relief or whether termination is proper in the absence of a further hearing on the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. FairSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. LawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Franklin v. Maynard, Director, South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Gaskins v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.