Legal Opinion

State v. Reekes

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 7, 1982No. 8226SC445PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

The State contends that the Speedy Trial Act allows the State to take a voluntary dismissal with leave and to reinstitute the proceedings at whatever time it chooses, and that the trial court erred in charging against the State the days between 2 September and 14 December, when the State had notice of defendant’s whereabouts but had not yet reinstituted proceedings. The statutes relied upon by the State are as follows:

§ 15A-701. Time limits and exclusions.(b) The following periods shall be excluded in computing the time within which the trial of a criminal offense must begin:(11)…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. State v. PippinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. AveryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Harvey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API