State v. Reekes
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
The State contends that the Speedy Trial Act allows the State to take a voluntary dismissal with leave and to reinstitute the proceedings at whatever time it chooses, and that the trial court erred in charging against the State the days between 2 September and 14 December, when the State had notice of defendant’s whereabouts but had not yet reinstituted proceedings. The statutes relied upon by the State are as follows:
§ 15A-701. Time limits and exclusions.(b) The following periods shall be excluded in computing the time within which the trial of a criminal offense must begin:(11)…
2Cited by8 opinions
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- State v. PippinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. AveryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Harvey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.