State v. Pippin
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
The State contends that the trial court erred in dismissing charges with prejudice against defendant because (1) it made findings of fact totally unsubstantiated by any evidence in the record as no evidence was presented at the hearing, and (2) it erred in concluding that defendant’s constitutional right to a speedy trial had been violated. We affirm the trial court’s order.
The fundamental law of this state provides every individual charged with a crime has the right to a speedy trial, e.g., State v. Webb, 155 N.C. 426, 70 S.E. 1064 (1911). This right is also protected by the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. WebsterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. ChaplinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. LujanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. HowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.