Legal Opinion

State v. Avery

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 1989No. 8814SC1283PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the trial court’s conclusion that as a matter of law the North Carolina Speedy Trial Act, G.S. 15A-701 et seq., did not apply to resentencing delays and that the defendant’s constitutional rights were not violated by the delay. We find no prejudicial error.

We note that the Speedy Trial Act, G.S. 15A-701 et seq., created “new rights, supplemental to the speedy trial rights existing under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution.” State v. Reekes, 59 N.C. App. 672, 677, 297 S.E.2d 763, 766, cert. denied, 307 N.C. 472, 298 S.E.2d 693 (1982).…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Wayne Paul Burkett v. Richard Cunningham, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  5. State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. WebsterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. TodiscoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. State v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. AzaniaIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Jolly v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API