Legal Opinion
La Cholla Curtis Ltd. Partnership v. Pima County
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 16, 1995No. 93-16186Published
1Opinion of the Court
57 F.3d 1077
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
LA CHOLLA CURTIS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Arizona limited
partnership; Desert Steppes I, an Arizona limited
Partnership,
Plaintiffs-Third-Party-Defendants-Appellants,
v.
PIMA COUNTY; Sanitary District No. 1 of Pima County,
Defendants-Third-Party-Plaintiffs-Appellees.
No. 93-16186.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jeanette Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, a Federally-Chartered Credit Union Robert W. FleischmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Philadelphia Electric Company v. Hercules, Inc. And Gould, Inc. Appeal of Hercules, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation Dist. No. 1 v. WarfordArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- State v. LeesonArizona Supreme Court · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.