Legal Opinion
Rexrode v. Bazar
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
Decided January 2, 1997No. 07-96-0121-CVPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOYD, Chief Justice.
In one point of error, appellant Kelly Rex-rode contends appellee Gregory Bazar (Ba-zar) was not entitled to the take-nothing summary judgment in his favor because the summary judgment evidence was not sufficient to establish his claims were barred under the collateral estoppel doctrine. Disagreeing, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The First Suit
The question presented in this appeal requires a rather detailed review of a prior lawsuit involving these parties. On March 29, 1993, appellant filed suit against Bazar and State Farm Insurance Company (State Farm). In…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Lear Siegler, Inc. v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Sysco Food Services, Inc. v. TrapnellTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Bonniwell v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Qantel Business Systems, Inc. v. Custom Controls Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Charles Brown, L.L.P. v. Lanier Worldwide, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
- Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Ruiz, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
- Santerre v. Agip Petroleum Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
- Tenet Health Systems Hospitals Dallas, Inc. v. North Texas Hospital Physicians Group, P.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
- State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. FullertonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.