Legal Opinion

National Shawmut Bank v. Hole

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 23, 1972PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReardon, J.

The plaintiffs, The National Shawmut Bank of Boston (Fiscal Agent) and three savings banks, the Worcester County Institution for Savings, the Malden Savings Bank, and The Boston Five Cents Savings Bank, holders of over ten per cent of the outstanding bonds of the defendant Woods Hole, Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship Authority (authority), bring this bill seeking declaratory relief. At stake is the disposition of certain funds held by the Fiscal Agent acting in that capacity under a resolution of the authority. The facts are not in dispute. We refer to the findings of the judge which…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hurle's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Chapman v. JocelynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Town of Milton v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  4. County of San Diego v. ChildsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Jeffreys v. Point Richmond Canal & Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard & Nantucket Steamship Authority v. Martha's Vineyard CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Western Massachusetts Electric Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Dale v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API