Legal Opinion

State v. Schaller

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1996No. Nos. WD 49851, WD 51754PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPINDEN, Judge.

Thomas Schaller appeals his convictions of forcible rape and forcible sodomy of a 15-year-old girl. He asserts that the circuit court abused its discretion by requiring Joe Everhart, Schaller’s accomplice, to assert his privilege against self-incrimination in the jury’s presence. He also complains of the circuit court’s permitting the state to call a rebuttal witness who had not been endorsed and of the circuit court’s overruling his motion for post-conviction remedies under Rule 29.15. We affirm.

Fifth Amendment

Before trial, the circuit court held a conference to determine…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. California v. ByersSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Danial Siebert v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. State v. SidebottomSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  5. State v. RoeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tarshish Jones v. City of Kansas City, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. State v. SamuelsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Dawson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. State v. ClarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State v. RegisterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API