Legal Opinion

Beam v. Fish

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 1, 1934Published

1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.

This is a motion by the defendant to dismiss the plaintiff’s exceptions. The cause was tried at the March Term, 1932, Rutland county court, Judge' Davis presiding. There were two defendants, Fish and Dansro. A verdict was directed for Fish, and the cause was continued as to Dansro, and passed to this Court upon exceptions by the plaintiff. It was heard at the Special Term at Rutland, November, 1932, and at the General Term in January, 1933, the exceptions were dismissed for the reasons given in the opinion, 105 Vt. 96, 163 Atl. 591. At the March Term, 1933, Rutland County, Judge But-tles…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Higgins, Admr. v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  2. Poulin v. GrahamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
  3. Hotel Vermont Co. v. CosgriffSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
  4. Beam v. FishSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  5. St. Albans Granite Co. v. Elwell & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API