Legal Opinion
Beam v. Fish
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 4, 1933PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.
In this case three defendants were sued as joint tortfeasors. The action was discontinued as to one of them, and went to trial, before a jury, against the other two. At the close of the evidence a verdict was directed in favor of the defendant Fish, and the plaintiff excepted. The case was thereupon continued as to the remaining defendant, Dansro, and the jury discharged. Judgment was entered upon the directed verdict, and the plaintiff has prosecuted his exceptions to this Court.
No question is presented for review. Except when the county court, in its discretion, may pass a case to the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hohorst v. Hamburg-American Packet Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Bowles v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1925
- Enmeier v. BlaizeIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
- Nelson v. BrownSupreme Court of Vermont · 1887
- Dickerson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1916
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Town of Putney v. Town of BrooklineSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
- Isabelle v. Proctor HospitalSupreme Court of Vermont · 1971
- Whitchurch v. PerrySupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- Murphy Motor Sales, Inc. v. First National BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
- Tucker v. BushwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.