Legal Opinion
United States v. Sharron Bynum
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 30, 2003No. 02-10016PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge.
Sharron Bynum (“Bynum”) appeals from the judgment entered by the district court following her conviction for aiding and abetting former City and County of Honolulu Councilman Andrew K. Mirikita-ni (“Mirikitani”) in intentionally and knowingly obtaining by fraud, and converting property of the City and County of Honolulu (“Honolulu”), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 666, and of affecting interstate commerce by aiding and abetting Mirikitani in committing extortion, under color of official right in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1951, 2. Bynum challenges the facial…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Phillips v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Hotel & Motel Ass'n v. City of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. PerlazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. TankersleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Anatoli ZakharovCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.