Legal Opinion
Lundeen v. Lappi
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 12, 1985No. C2-84-1370, C7-84-1946PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
This appeal is taken from a judgment entered May 7, 1984. The trial court concluded respondent Lundeen was entitled to elect either rescission of his contract to purchase property or an $8,000 abatement. The court also held respondent Lappi was entitled to indemnity from appellants for the abatement and for attorney’s fees he incurred in defending against Lundeen’s abatement action. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
This appeal arises from the sale of lake-shore property with a year-around residence near Alexandria, Minnesota. Respondent Lappi purchased the property, sight…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Evans v. BlesiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Material Movers, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Marriage of Gummow v. GummowCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- First Fiduciary Corp. v. BlancoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dennis Simmons D.D.S., P.A. v. Modern Aero, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Mattson v. Underwriters at Lloyds of LondonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Fette v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Wurst v. FriendshuhCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Mattson v. Underwriters at Lloyds of LondonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986