Nason v. Barrett
Supreme Court of Minnesota
The proceedings after the former appeal, reported in 140 Minn. 366, 168 N. W. 581, are narrated in the first paragraph of the opinion. From the order of the district court for Ramsey county, Michael, J., defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
The judgment entered herein on May 1, 1918, was affirmed in this court (Nason v. Barrett, 140 Minn. 366, 168 N. W. 581), costs taxed, and remittitur issued on August 1, 1918, and mailed by the clerk of this court to plaintiff’s attorneys. There had been some negotiation between the parties in regard to the manner of paying the sum named in the judgment. Nothing came of the same. Defendant paid the costs taxed against him in this court on the sixteenth of August, and on the next day the remittitur, or mandate, was filed in the court below, and at the same time plaintiff deposited with the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nason v. BarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Hunt v. Meeker County Abstract & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Fonda v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
3Cited by1 opinion
- Farmers Merchants State Bank of Hawley v. MellumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928